What isn’t the right answer regarding online learning?
Friday, October 30th, 2009
How tall isn’t the Eiffel Tower?
Dan Meyer posed this question in a recent online discussion. I haven’t been able to get this simple question out of my head since. This technique is probably introduced in day 2 of Teaching Inquiry 101 across every undergraduate teaching program in the world. I must have been absent that day.
Think about it. The right answer rarely interesting. Most can figure that out in a few seconds and move on. Equally uninteresting are the incorrect answers 10 feet and 10,000 feet. The beauty is all in the process of getting closer to what the correct answer probably is. Why do you think that is the right answer? How did you reach that conclusion? Where will you check to see if you are close?
This little exercise has helped me tremendously in rethinking the topic of online learning. Interestingly, my professional life is now affording me the opportunity to explore “online learning” in a completely new way. The boundaries of this new endeavor are more defined by what the right answers “aren’t” than what the right answer “is”. In a world of accountability where things are often times measured against the “right” answer, I have the chance to help the community explore online learning with few “right” answers to get in our way.
Example: “Blended learning!” The concept of blended learning isn’t a “right” answer that makes online learning effective. Even if we managed to get everybody on the same page regarding the effectiveness of a blended learning strategy, we’d probably only make an incremental step towards being where it is we need to be. It’s the same “Define technology!” and “Technology is just a tool!” conversations from the 1990’s and the “Students need 21st Century Skills™” drumbeat of the current decade.
I have the chance to lead people beyond “the big frickn’ wall” and advance thinking around online learning. “Blended learning!”, “Define technology!”, “Technology is just a tool!”, and “21st Century Skills™” are all places we end up with incremental improvements. We need to stretch further. The “big frickin’ wall” of having to nail the right answer isn’t an issue.

To borrow again from Dan Meyer, “WCYDWT?” What could you do with this? I’m looking for a bit of input here. What does “Where we need to be?” look like?
Eiffel Tower Photo Credit: Flickr Creative Commons
Incremental vs. Revolutionary Imrpovements Photo Credit: Kathy Sierra










I looked for the quote that summarized this entire story. The entire AP story was gold.

